Sunday, August 16, 2009

Elecraft P3

K3 with prototype P3 panadapter unit

The long-awaited Elecraft panadapter unit for the K3 is now officially beyond the rumor-and-innuendo stage of development. The announcement on 11-Aug by Wayne N6KR and Eric WA6HHQ was immediately followed by the predictable flurry of questions, praise, complaints, nit-picking and feature requests that Elecrafters have grown to expect any time a new product is announced, ranging from the serious to the absurd:
  • Q: Will there be point-and-click tuning? (A: Yes.)

  • Q: Will it be I/Q-based and thus able to use PowerSDR, Skimmer, etc.? (A: Perhaps.)

  • Q: Will their be a built-in speaker and/or power supply? (A: No.)

  • Q: Will the P3 be able to be used for text display in data modes? (A: It's on the list...)

  • Q: The photo shows it on the left side of the K3. This is an affront to the Right Handed-American Community. Will there be a right-side version to comply with the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment? (A: Huh?)
(OK, that last question wasn't exactly asked in those words, but one guy really expressed concern that a photo showing it on the left side of the K3 meant that it wouldn't be "optimized" for use on right side. You can't make this stuff up...)

I love Elecraft and their close relationship with their customers, but I've previously commented [see here, read last paragraph] that in the future (that is, now) they need to play their cards a bit closer to their vest than they did with the K3. It has to be counterproductive to announce a product too early, then spend valuable time fielding absurd questions, squelching rumors and erroneous information from well-meaning Kool-Aid Drinkers (I use that term in the most endearing way), and generally trying to please everyone with an ever expanding feature list to accommodate feature requests from customers. All of this ends up pushing the delivery date back, causing the company to endure months of bitching and moaning about deadlines promises being broken, features left out, firmware revisions, fix bugs, etc. This is what happened with the K3, and sadly I can see it happening again right before my very eyes. Sigh.

That said, I like the concept; it adds the most lamented missing feature of the K3 (perhaps second only to band-stacking registers). I plan to order one as soon as it is orders are accepted. Whether I place it to the left or right of my K3 has yet to be determined...

2 comments:

K8AC said...

From a rational standpoint, a product "exists" only when it's available for purchase by customers. Elecraft is one of the worst offenders in the amateur radio world for showing potential products that don't appear for years or NEVER are sold. Remember the HF amplifiers shown at Dayton years back? Icom has been selling transceivers for 20 years with pretty good spectrum scopes, while Elecraft and Ten Tec haven't got it figured out yet.

Paul WW2PT said...

@K8AC: You are correct about the early announcement thing which plagues Elecraft. Early announcements are not uncommon - e.g., Microsoft announced Windows 7 almost a year before it shipped - nor inherently evil.

Unfortunately, we've become an instant gratification society. For this reason alone it might have been better had the K3 been kept under wraps for at least a few more months until a more accurate delivery date could be determined; or at the very least the delivery date should have been liberally overestimated -- if they had promised the K3 in 12 months and then shipped it in 9, they'd have looked like heroes. Instead, Elecraft stated a 4 or 5 month delivery, shipped in 9 months, and had to endure months of bitching and moaning as a result.

I know nothing of the circumstances surrounding the amps shown at Dayton -- were the amps announced as upcoming releases, or simply displayed as prototypes? Neither am I aware of any other products that were announced by Elecraft that didn't make it to market. Whether or not they were announced prematurely is another story.

All said, I am a patient man. I waited 9 months for my K3 and would do it again if I had to. I've chimed in on all this before, so I won't repeat myself.

73 & thanks for the comments!
Paul WW2PT